Explore the vast range of titles available.

This article examines three emergent processes in physician-hospital integrated delivery systems (IDSs). We find these processes are underdeveloped based on data gathered from a national sample of hospitals drawn from nine health care systems. These processes are also loosely coupled with the structures used to integrate physicians and hospitals, as well as with the environmental context in which they occur. Such loose coupling entails both advantages and disadvantages for IDSs.

Hospital federations are a form of multiorganizational collaboration in which a management group coordinates and directs the activities of three or more organizations. This paper introduces a life-cycle model of federations that focuses on factors that influence the transition from one stage to another.

Objectives. To assess the extent to which market pressures, compensation incentives, and physician medical group culture are associated with the use of evidence-based medicine practices in physician organizations. Methods. Cross-sectional exploratory study of 56 medical groups affiliated with 15 integrated health systems from across the United States, involving 1,797 physician respondents. Larger medical groups and multispecialty groups were over-represented compared with the United States as a whole. Data are from two sources: (1) surveys of physicians assessing the culture of the medical groups in which they work, and (2) surveys of medical directors and other managerial key informants pertaining to care management practices, compensation methods, and the management and governance of the medical groups. Physician-level data were aggregated to the group level to attain measures of group culture and then merged with the data regarding care management, incentives, and management and governance. Stepwise multiple regression was used to examine the study hypotheses. Results. As hypothesized, the number of different types of compensation incentives used (cost containment, productivity, quality) was positively associated with the comprehensiveness of care management practices. The degree of salary control (ie, market-based salary grades and ranges versus the use of bookings or fees and individual negotiation) was also positively associated with the deployment of care management practices. As hypothesized, market pressures in the form of percentages of health maintenance and preferred provider organization patients seen were generally positively associated with the use of care management practices. Organizational culture had no association except that a patient-centered culture in combination with a greater number of different types of compensation incentives used was positively associated with greater use of care management practices. Conclusions. Both compensation incentives and managed care market pressures were significantly associated with the use of evidence-based care management practices. The lack of association for culture may be due to the relatively amorphous nature of most physician organizations at this point.

Underscoring the importance of physician-organization alignment as a necessary condition for building and sustaining integrated healthcare systems, this article provides information regarding the nature of such alignment, the key influential factors, and the processes employed to make alignment a reality. Structural and strategic factors address the influence of environmental, market, and organizational characteristics on alignment. The strategic intent of organizations and physicians, and physician perspectives on the effects of integration, are explored. Key processes examined include building trust, placing physicians in management and governance, and developing physician leadership. Continuing issues and challenges are considered, and a set of principles to help guide the journey of physicians and organizations toward successful alignment is suggested.

As health care delivery organizations develop into integrated health care systems, new and significant challenges arise with respect to how such systems should he governed. This article explores several key governance issues that organizations are likely to encounter as they attempt to effect the transition from hospital or multihospital system governance arrangements to those appropriate for integrated systems.

The resource dependence perspective is used to describe the formation of hospital alliances. Characteristics of alliances and their various strategies and structures are discussed. A life cycle model provides a framework for viewing the development and growth of alliances. Several dimensions for assessing alliance performance are proposed.

A new organizational species is emerging-the integrated health care delivery system. Aligned with both the anticipated provisions of federal and state health care reform initiatives and emerging purchaser demands, integrated delivery systems could dominate many health care markets by the end of this decade. Integration is both the defining feature and key imperative of such systems. Because of the unique position of boards, governance is potentially the ultimate integrator. Yet little attention had been focused on integrated delivery system governance. Accordingly, this article will address the governance of integrated delivery systems through three questions: (1) What are the distinguishing characteristics of integrated health care delivery systems? (2) What are the distinctive issues and challenges associated with governing integrated delivery systems? and (3) What different forms of governance can be employed by these systems and what factors influence the effectiveness of these forms?

This article examines the role of multihospital systems and alliances as \"innovation carriers.\" Drawing upon studies of interpersonal and interorganizational communications networks, the authors suggest how membership in a system or alliance, as well as network characteristics, affects innovation practices in general acute care hospitals.

The merger of rural primary care and home health services offers the potential of increasing the administrative efficiency of health care, and thereby enhancing quality of care and increasing access to services, particularly health promotion. In a merger of rural health services in Northeastern Vermont, a survey of key community leaders revealed that improved organization of services, improved health status and greater accessibility of services were benefits expected and to some extent realized as a result of the merger process. The desire to preserve community-based services and having a common philosophy were important factors which served to initiate the merger. The actions of a few key individuals and the support of involved organizations were instrumental in continuing the process.